The Master’s Degree in Metaphysical Science, blogger.com, Program. The Master’s Degree in Metaphysical Science, blogger.com, program is through the University of Metaphysics. The program consists of 18 modules with 18 open-book exams, and requires in addition the submission of a thesis with a minimum word count of 6, words Oct 06, · The Sophist and Statesman are late Platonic dialogues, whose relative dates are established by their stylistic similarity to the Laws, a work that was apparently still “on the wax” at the time of Plato’s death (Diogenes Laertius ).These dialogues are important in exhibiting Plato’s views on method and metaphysics after he criticized his own most famous contribution to the history A vast array of webinars covering our course material, meditation techniques, interviews with students, thesis and dissertation writing tips, and help to select your Doctoral degree specialty. The webinar’s for the Bachelor’s and Master’s degree coursework provides a
OSIRIS Student Mobile
This entry will focus on method and metaphysics. The Sophist and Statesman represent themselves as the first two members of a trilogy, which was to include a third member, the Philosophera dialogue Plato never wrote. The Theaetetus and Sophist are also linked more remotely to the Parmenidesa conversation Socrates says he had with the great philosopher of Elea, when Parmenides was old and he was very young Theaetetus e—a, Sophist c.
Socrates plays a minor role in master metaphysics thesis conversations in the Sophist and Statesmanobserving the proceedings but replaced as main speaker by a visitor from Elea, a follower of Parmenides, who converses with Theaetetus in the Sophist and with a young man named Socrates the Younger in the Statesman.
Although the Sophist and Statesman are dialogues, the interaction between the Stranger and his two young interlocutors seems rather different from that between Socrates and his interlocutors in the Socratic dialogues, including the Theaetetus. Young Socrates in the Statesman is particularly prone to misunderstandings and mistakes. These dramatic features raise questions of philosophical importance. Why does Plato connect the Sophist and Statesman with the Theaetetus and Parmenidesdialogues written in all probability a good deal earlier?
Why does Plato replace Socrates with the colorless visitor from Elea? Elsewhere Plato allows speakers to give long speeches e. Sophist d with Parmenides b? The Sophist and Statesman strike many scholars as more dogmatic than other Platonic dialogues. The Stranger sets out to master metaphysics thesis the sophist, master metaphysics thesis, the statesman, and the philosopher, claiming that they are three distinct kinds Sophist a—b ; the two existing dialogues appear to give successful definitions of their target kinds and to present and defend significant methodological and metaphysical positions.
The Sophist arguably solves the problem of false statement, one of a family of problems that had dogged other Platonic dialogues, including the Theaetetus. Perhaps, too, readers are meant to recall the Parmenidesa dialogue staged some fifty years earlier, in which Parmenides himself led the conversation.
In the second part of the dialogue, Parmenides then demonstrated with a youthful respondent master metaphysics thesis sort of exercise he had in mind, focusing on another thesis for which he was famous, that there is only one thing Parmenides a—b, b. For discussion of the dialogue form in these late works, cf, master metaphysics thesis.
Fredemaster metaphysics thesis, Roweand C. Gill The Sophist and Statesman each undertake a particular task, the first to define a sophist, the second to define a statesman.
But they master metaphysics thesis a larger purpose. The Statesman gives many indications that the investigation of the statesman is being undertaken not primarily for its own sake but for the sake of a greater project—our becoming better dialecticians Statesman d, d—a. The Stranger makes this announcement, first reminding Young Socrates of a previous discussion about children learning their letters:.
Next the Stranger talks about examples, such as weaving, for which there are perceptible likenesses, easy to understand, which an instructor can point to when an inquirer has trouble grasping a verbal account.
But there are other things, described as greatest and most valuable, that cannot be observed or imaged. It is for the master metaphysics thesis of those harder topics that the inquirers practice giving and receiving an account on simple examples, such as weaving, where they can fall back on perceptible instances. The Stranger says:.
We first practice giving and receiving a verbal account on easy examples like weaving, which can also be observed and imaged. Then we practice on difficult examples, such as the statesman. Here we must give and receive a verbal account without relying on visual aids. But the statesman is still part of the exercise. Our inquiry about him is itself undertaken to make us better dialecticians, able to deal with all such topics.
If we can succeed with the statesman, master metaphysics thesis, we will have learned a technique, master metaphysics thesis, or how to find a technique, that can be applied to other difficult cases, such as the philosopher, master metaphysics thesis. The Statesman chiefly aims to demonstrate how to undertake all such inquiries. Its own inquiry stimulates the participants and us readers to recognize what mistakes to avoid and what paths are worth pursuing and why.
But significantly, as one sees from comparing the treatments of the sophist and statesman, different kinds of subject matter demand different sorts of methods. So we cannot simply extend the methods of the Sophist and Statesman in a mechanical way to the investigation of the philosopher and other great and difficult topics.
These dialogues teach us how to go about philosophical investigations. They do not offer a formula that can be simply applied to further cases. If the Sophist and Statesman are philosophical exercises, there may be a good reason why the final dialogue of the trilogy, the Philosopheris missing. Plato would spoil the lesson if he wrote it for us cf, master metaphysics thesis.
Dorter If we have learned how to investigate philosophical problems in the Sophist and StatesmanPlato may be challenging his audience to search for the philosopher themselves, using the techniques and recommendations these dialogues provide M.
Gill, The Sophist master metaphysics thesis Statesman search for definitions, and both dialogues focus on the search. The Sophist speaks often of the hunt in which we are engaged and of the sophist as our quarry.
In this hunt the sophist time and again eludes us, taking cover in the darkness of not-being, reappearing occasionally to dispute the very existence of the kind to which we wish to assign him. How can we define the sophist at all, if we cannot get hold of him or coherently characterize the kind to which he belongs?
The Statesman repeatedly notices the road traveled—longer roads and shorter roads that will take us to our destination or lead us astray. The dialogue often reflects on better and worse methods of seeking the goal.
The Sophist and the first part of the Statesman represent the search by means of an elaborate tree-like system of roads. The inquirers travel down these branching roads; at each fork they must choose which branch to take in the hope of finding their quarry, and that quarry alone, at the terminus. This method of discovery is called divisionand in its most usual form it is the repeated dichotomy of a general kind master metaphysics thesis two subordinate kinds.
Inquirers use division to locate a target kind at the terminus of one branch of the division. A definition, when reached by this means, recounts master metaphysics thesis steps of the journey, master metaphysics thesis. Where does an investigation into a topic such as sophistry or statesmanship begin?
He aims to establish agreement about the kind to which they ascribe the name Sophist b—cand he wants to find a real definition—a definition that applies to all and only members of the kind, and one that explains why any instance is master metaphysics thesis instance of that kind: master metaphysics thesis inquirers seek the essence of the target kind, the property or collection of properties that make the kind what it is.
As a preliminary step in locating the essence of a kind, the inquirers must figure out what people understand master metaphysics thesis the name of that kind. This opening maneuver can occur in several ways: First, what does the name connote, master metaphysics thesis, and what associations does it conjure up?
In addition, the Stranger relates statesman and king Statesman e and relies on the Homeric epithet of Agamemnon as shepherd of the people cf. Miller40— The image of a herdsman quietly guides the initial attempt to define the statesman, whom the Stranger identifies in the opening division as herdsman of the human flock. Second, what sorts of individuals does the name pick out, and what features do those individuals share? Socrates regularly objects that the interlocutor has merely given him a list, whereas he wants to know what all the items on the list have in common and what makes them all instances of one kind, master metaphysics thesis.
Although he complains about the list, it master metaphysics thesis to orient the investigation, because reflection on the list equips the inquirers to see the common features master metaphysics thesis by all the items enumerated. The Phaedrus calls this technique collectionand it is used together with division Phaedrus d—b. A collection can occur at the beginning of an investigation and at any step of a division.
By means of collection an inquirer brings together a number master metaphysics thesis disparate things or kinds of things, often called master metaphysics thesis different names, into one kind. The Statesman offers a good example of a collection at the outset of its inquiry.
The visitor gathers together several kinds of things, called by different names, into one kind—the target kind to be defined:, master metaphysics thesis. The visitor remarks that although we call these people by different names, they all have in common a power to maintain their rule by the strength of their understanding with little use of their hands and bodies Statesman c.
This is a rough and ready description of the target kind the inquirers hope to find at the terminus of their division. This crude description enables them to pick out a wide kind to divide knowledge, epistêmêand to take a number of steps in the division. The Stranger first divides knowledge into practical and theoretical and then seeks to locate the target kind at the master metaphysics thesis stemming from theoretical knowledge.
At the beginning of the investigation into the sophist, master metaphysics thesis, the Stranger says they need to practice master metaphysics thesis investigation on a paradigm paradeigmabefore they embark on the difficult and controversial topic before them. In the Parmenides and elsewhere Plato speaks of separate, immaterial forms as paradigms, and sensible particulars as likenesses of them, which somehow fall short of the original.
A paradigm involves a mundane example with a feature—sometimes an essential feature—relevant to the definition master metaphysics thesis the more difficult kind under investigation. Master metaphysics thesis the Sophistan angler, defined as a sort of hunter, guides the initial search for the sophist, who is also identified as a sort of hunter, master metaphysics thesis. A paradigm is not merely an example or paradigmatic example of some general kind, as angling is an example of hunting and more generally of expertise.
The search for the definition of the example reveals a procedure, which can be transferred to the harder case, independent of content. Different paradigms introduce different procedures. The angler introduces the method of dichotomous division, and the definition of the angler recounts the steps on one side of that division.
Both the procedure and definitional structure are featured in the harder case. Again, the example shares properties in common with the target kind—both the weaver and the statesman engage in the art of intertwining, master metaphysics thesis, among other things.
The paradigm also introduces a procedure that can be extended to the target. By means of such division he gradually marks off the kind to be defined weaver or statesman from other sorts of experts related to it in various ways and operating in the same domain. Master metaphysics thesis paradigm indicates how to go on—how to take the opening steps in an investigation or how to get beyond an impasse.
The divisions in the Sophist and Statesman are divisions of arts angling, sophistry, master metaphysics thesis, weaving, statecraftand only secondarily of experts who possess those arts, master metaphysics thesis. The art makes the expert the sort of expert he is. The initial attempts to define the sophist and statesman, using the method of dichotomous division, each reveal a puzzle about the target kind, master metaphysics thesis, and that puzzle is then resolved in some other way, or at least in conjunction with some other master metaphysics thesis. The sophist is puzzling because his art turns up, not at a single terminus like angling, but at many different termini.
Reflection on this peculiarity enables the inquirers to recognize something they had previously missed—the essence of the sophist—which ties together the various previous appearances.
The paradigm of the angler demonstrates the method of dichotomous division and steers the first attempt to define the sophist. An angler has a humble profession, master metaphysics thesis, familiar to everyone Sophist e : an angler hunts water creatures using a special sort of hook, master metaphysics thesis. He divides art into two subordinate kinds, productive and acquisitive, then continues to divide the acquisitive branch until he reaches the terminus, where he finds angling marked off as what it is, apart master metaphysics thesis everything else.
The sophist resembles the angler in possessing expertise, but more intimately as well. He, too, is a sort of hunter, but one who hunts terrestrial creatures rather than aquatic. The Stranger first defines the sophist as master metaphysics thesis hired hunter of rich young men Sophist b; d. So far angling seems well suited to direct the inquirers toward their goal.
writing a master's thesis - my experience
, time: 14:15Method and Metaphysics in Plato’s Sophist and Statesman (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
A vast array of webinars covering our course material, meditation techniques, interviews with students, thesis and dissertation writing tips, and help to select your Doctoral degree specialty. The webinar’s for the Bachelor’s and Master’s degree coursework provides a Paragraph Starters for Persuasive Essays. Persuasive essays have a single purpose - to convince your reader of something. Some writers choose to wade into the waters gradually, winning the reader Ph.D. Program The program of studies leading to the doctorate in philosophy provides subjects and seminars in such traditional areas as logic, ethics, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, aesthetics, social and political philosophy, and history of philosophy. Interest in philosophical problems arising from other disciplines, such as
No comments:
Post a Comment